Gumdrop Northern is usually an American company that delivered body battle suits and armored vehicles for the U. S. armed forces. Our authorities trusted Gumdrop to develop and manufacture the products in order to shield the lives of military during their tasks. However , throughout their business functions with the U. S. military, many flaws were found that lead to the death of U. S. soldiers which in turn eventually lead to the felony prosecution in the company. This kind of memorandum will analyze the ethical, monetary, and legal issues that encircled this case
The first moral issue that exists in cases like this is the fact that Gumdrop decided to export their very own manufactured landmines to Afghanistan and Iran contrary to international law and treaties. Also, it is a legal issue because of the fact they will violated intercontinental law. One of the groups the landmines had been sent to was your Iranian government. There are many issues between Usa and the U. S. in the past that have triggered the possibility of an attack within the United States. If the Iranian government surely could get the technology we use in our protection, they could be capable of use it against us during an attack. (Shachtman, 2012) The second group was Afghanistan; a country composed of the Taliban that has been a frequent threat towards the U. S. for a long period of your time. An American business that is generating technology pertaining to the U. S. armed service should not be mailing any type of similar technology into a foreign nation, especially when that country involves one of the U. S. is actually biggest threats. It is a direct violation of international regulation and obviously Gumdrop Northern reveals no matter over it since the majority of their particular profit was coming from these types of foreign agreements. Did they ever feel that these landmines could be applied against the U. S. army and get rid of American troops? This negatively affects not merely the U. S. armed forces, but Americans that are a target of terrorist businesses. The case especially says they will sold these landmines towards the Taliban. The Taliban was obviously a group that protected the people responsible for the 9/11 assault on the United States, Al-Qaeda. To think that a terrorist organization just like Al-Qaeda might get their on the job military technology is scary. (Nachmias, 1999)
The second ethical issue that exists in such a case is quality of the goods that Gumdrop Northern sold to the U. S. and foreign countries. First, they were paid a lot of money for his or her products therefore it is already presumed that the top quality would be as good as possible. I think there were some specifications in regards to what the quality needs to be exactly in the contract between your two corporations. One of the flaws found in the merchandise was that your body armor would not protect assistance members by most antipersonnel ammunition. If perhaps there was a normal issue flak jacket put into it, a majority of the accidents wouldn't occurred; however , Gumdrop Northern didn't disclose this information because of the dread they had of losing the contract. Another defect within their product was found in the armored vehicles; there was only a thin sheet of metal on the bottom with the vehicles which in turn made all of them vulnerable to IED explosions. The past defect that was present in their products was in the landmines they brought to the Taliban and Iranian government. There were faulty switches inside the landmines that killed the soldiers, along with kids that were present, trying to use them. This decision affected the lives in the people who used this body armor, and added even more expenses to get the U. S. armed service since they would have to continue buying the faulty body armor that didn't work well.
The third ethical issue is definitely how Gumdrop Northern taken care of the felony prosecution that they faced in the Department of Justice, and all of the money that they owed from the class-action law suits. Even though they had sufficient funds to pay out the class-action plaintiffs, and replace the most notable executives in the event that they were...
Bibliography: Nachmias, D. (1999, September). It 's official: Taliban pose a hazard to the United States. The
Middle Consume Quarterly, 6(3), 92-93. Recovered from http://www.meforum.org/483/its-
Shachtman, N. (2012, January) " Iran At this point a 'Top Threat ' to U. S. Sites, Spy Key Claims |
Risk Room | Wired. com. " Born. N. g., Web. 13 Oct. 2012.
Us Department of labor, (n. d. ). The member of staff adjustment and retraining notice act
(warn). Retrieved from internet site: http://www.dol.gov/compliance/laws/comp-warn.htm